Jurawelt-Forum

Herr Anwalt hat geschrieben:Es ist doch wirklich simpel:
Alle geeigneten Mittel die zur Erforschung des Sachverhaltes geeignet sind.

Herr Anwalt hat geschrieben: Nachdem Colin Powell den Weltsicherheitsrat im Jahr 2003 sogar arglistig getäuscht hat, um einen völkerrechtswidrigen Angriffskrieg mit in der Folge hunderttausenden oder millionen Toten zu starten, kann ich mir alles vorstellen. Sowohl, dass es die Sachverhalte in der Realität überhaupt nicht gegeben hat, über False Flag, bis zur Tatsache, dass Assad tatsächlich was getan hat.

Ladies and gentleman, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookie from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about that. That does not make sense.

Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: "What does this have to do with this case?" Nothing.

Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me, I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca. Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberating and conjugating the Emancipation Proclamation... does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.